Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Fuel Injection
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Fuel Injection

 Post Reply Post Reply Page    <12
Author
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 10:23pm


Here is my fuel injected boats label next to the filler,they really don't like alcohol either . Maybe it's more of a handling problem rather than a fuel type. Do you use any fuel stabilizer? If I could I would not use alcohol either but here we have no choice.
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41040
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 8:41pm
Originally posted by KenVan KenVan wrote:

    My only issues recently have been with the fuel system, and in this era of ethanolized fuel. Ethanol is not friendly to these older systems. Since I can't get ethanol-free gas (at a reasonable cost), I want to modernize the fuel system to accommodate the fuel.


Ken,
I'm curious as to what problems are you having with the ethanol? I too run ethanol and have since they started making it. I have never had any problems with my 54, 64 or 77 and have done nothing to them. In all honesty, sometimes I feel people use the ethanol as an excuse to engine problems they can't diagnose.


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
KenVan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: July-05-2018
Location: Wayne, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KenVan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 8:21pm
Originally posted by DayTony DayTony wrote:

Originally posted by KenVan KenVan wrote:


I want "turn key" every spring, without fail.


Fuel Injection, is certainly not going to accomplish this for you.
Just ask anyone who has it. I dont think "turn key" every spring truly exists in the world of boating. There will always be maintenance and general work that will need to be done. Personally the closest you might get is a yamaha outboard. But even then if you think you're going to shut it off in november and fire it back up in april without a hiccup it may only work for a few consecutive years.
If you're unable to do the work each season find a mechanic who can. You will probably break even as far as costs go vs going with a peiced together F.I.


Wise words, generally speaking. But we've owned the boat since it was new (it's a 1968) and it has always been very reliable. It's a Correct Craft, right? I added electronic ignition in the 90's, and that has proven to be a good upgrade. My only issues recently have been with the fuel system, and in this era of ethanolized fuel. Ethanol is not friendly to these older systems. Since I can't get ethanol-free gas (at a reasonable cost), I want to modernize the fuel system to accommodate the fuel.

I'm not necessarily looking for feedback from those who have a stock EFI boat, because I don't think those are great systems. I'm looking for feedback from those who have put aftermarket EFI on their motor. Do you have any experience with aftermarket EFI systems?
'68 CC Mustang, original owner
Back to Top
gun-driver View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: July-18-2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Status: Offline
Points: 4112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gun-driver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 7:54pm
Originally posted by Gary S Gary S wrote:


Knock on wood,for the last 5 seasons my 95 fires off after sitting for 6 months just like I ran it yesterday,but I think the carb'd ones would too if they used electric fuel pumps


Gary I was going to say something but didn't want to side track the thread. Just a little over two weeks ago I fired up my '95 for the first time since last fall.
Reinstalled the impeller, tightened the belts, added 10 gallons of fresh gas, hooked up the battery and I don't think the starter turned two times and she's alive!!!!
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41040
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 6:16pm
Originally posted by Gary S Gary S wrote:

,for the last 5 seasons my 95 fires off after sitting for 6 months just like I ran it yesterday,but I think the carb'd ones would too if they used electric fuel pumps

After a layup, all it takes with a carb'd engine with a mechanical pump is a couple squirts of gas down the manifold and they fire up just like it ran yesterday too.

I always have one of these when I get an engine running come spring.



Sure does save me having to spend $1,500 on a FI system that's questionable with the USCG!


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 5:46pm
Here you go take off the parts you don't need, use your Interceptor mounts,bellhousing,exhaust,etc, get a PCM 1.23 trans to spin the prop the correct way and off you go! And it could be theoretically serviced by a Volvo Penta dealer
Knock on wood,for the last 5 seasons my 95 fires off after sitting for 6 months just like I ran it yesterday,but I think the carb'd ones would too if they used electric fuel pumps
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10715
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 4:49pm
Now as far as the USCG goes, there is the category of parts that have actually been tested and received the USCG "stamp of approval". They usually advertise that fact pretty prominently and have a sticker or tag on that piece of equipment that says it's approved.

Then there are those companies that advertise that their piece of equipment meets USCG standards. They haven't got the "stamp of approval" though because they haven't undergone the expensive testing.

But people use the stuff and the company lawyers must know it's OK if for example somebody blows themselves and a couple of passengers 20 ft into the air .because for example their non USCG approved, but meets the specs distributor caused an explosion.

Everybody with a DUI marine distributor raise your hand now and say it "meets the specs, but it doesn't have that official stamp of approval" and tell KenVan how a marine AFI system is any different than your favorite distributor.

I don't know the answer to the meets vs approved issue but I figure those lawyers for all these different companies aren't too worried about it for some reason.

DUI is just an example, there are plenty of others selling marine stuff that "meets the spec"

AFI advertises that it's marine and they go to boat shows selling it so they must have confidence in it's marine capabilities


Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41040
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by DayTony DayTony wrote:

Originally posted by KenVan KenVan wrote:


I want "turn key" every spring, without fail.


Fuel Injection, is certainly not going to accomplish this for you.

I agree.

Ken,
maybe we can help if you describe the problem you have in the springs?


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
DayTony View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: June-30-2013
Location: Salem MA
Status: Offline
Points: 831
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DayTony Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 4:07pm
Originally posted by KenVan KenVan wrote:


I want "turn key" every spring, without fail.


Fuel Injection, is certainly not going to accomplish this for you.
Just ask anyone who has it. I dont think "turn key" every spring truly exists in the world of boating. There will always be maintenance and general work that will need to be done. Personally the closest you might get is a yamaha outboard. But even then if you think you're going to shut it off in november and fire it back up in april without a hiccup it may only work for a few consecutive years.
If you're unable to do the work each season find a mechanic who can. You will probably break even as far as costs go vs going with a peiced together F.I.
1988 Barefoot nautique-454
Back to Top
KenVan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: July-05-2018
Location: Wayne, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KenVan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 4:04pm
Originally posted by Gary S Gary S wrote:

Please understand I'm just being devils advocate. It does not matter to you if you feel a FI system is safer than a carb,it's the Coast Guard who determines that. Say if you did use non approved components and something happened,a sharp lawyer could put you into a world of hurt. That said are you looking for an off the shelf throttle body type system or port injection system you could build up yourself like a Megasquirt system and using say 5.0 Mustang intake components? Maybe you could find a working PCM Pro Tec system- the hurtle there being finding a working system and making a 351 distributor fit a 289. It's going to be alot of work any way you go. Do you have an Interceptor in it now?


Yes; Interceptor.

I understand about the USCG. They merely enforce regulations and it's the regulations that I might disagree with, but that is neither here nor there. Assume for the purpose of this forum that we're talking about a USCG approved system.

I'm looking for a TBI. Several years ago, I looked at a system by Howell Engineering. It's a refurbished Chevy TBI, computer, harness, complete system. I didn't pull the trigger then because I suspected that better systems were on the horizon. FAST makes a slick throttle body that closely resembles a 4 bbl carb, but they do not currently offer a marine system with optional O2 sensor. A previous post just above here provided a link to Affordable Fuel Injection's website and they have a very reasonable kit/system. I think the hardest part of the install might be adding a return fuel line to the tank. USCG approval might end up being the determining factor.
'68 CC Mustang, original owner
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 3:51pm
Please understand I'm just being devils advocate. It does not matter to you if you feel a FI system is safer than a carb,it's the Coast Guard who determines that. Say if you did use non approved components and something happened,a sharp lawyer could put you into a world of hurt. That said are you looking for an off the shelf throttle body type system or port injection system you could build up yourself like a Megasquirt system and using say 5.0 Mustang intake components? Maybe you could find a working PCM Pro Tec system- the hurtle there being finding a working system and making a 351 distributor fit a 289. It's going to be alot of work any way you go. Do you have an Interceptor in it now?
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
KENO View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: June-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10715
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote KENO Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 3:18pm
If I was thinking about maybe doing something like this, I might talk to the outfit in the link since they advertise a marine EFI system for 302 Fords (not exactly your 289)

I have no knowledge about dealing with the company, but have seen their stuff on older Jeeps and it worked well.

link
Back to Top
KenVan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: July-05-2018
Location: Wayne, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KenVan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 3:12pm
Originally posted by Gary S Gary S wrote:

Using your thinking “it’s 2018” leave the Mustang alone and buy a FI boat. If you insist of wanting a 68 fuel injected boat drop in a new motor and take advantage of a true computer controlled fuel injected engine instead as also fits pieced together system IMHO.


It's complicated...    The lake we live on has horsepower limits imposed in the 1970's; 140 HP and 18' length max. I would buy a new Nautique, but I can't put it on this lake. My boat has been 'grandfathered' in since we owned it prior to the regulations. I need to keep this baby running. A neighbor of ours bought a Nautique 176, and they made him put a 4 cylinder engine in it. It can barely get out of it's own way. So sad.
'68 CC Mustang, original owner
Back to Top
KenVan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: July-05-2018
Location: Wayne, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KenVan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 3:05pm
Thank you. USCG approval is a concern...but I would think EFI would be much safer than a carb in all respects. Also, O2 sensor is optional on some kits. What I've learned is that the O2 sensor provides vital feedback when the motor is under varying 'strain' or load. For example; in a car, you have multiple gear ratios, a shifting transmission, uphill strain, downhill strain, quick acceleration for passing, towing strain, etc. In a boat, you have one forward gear and relatively steady drag throughout the throttle range. Therefore, the fuel delivery curve on a boat motor can be programmed and set into the EFI computer upon setup, and then it's fixed. You can always tweak the program if necessary, but . This method is not as efficient as getting O2 sensor feedback into the computer, but the boat operator will never notice the difference and the system (so I've been told) will work swimmingly.

I want "turn key" every spring, without fail.
'68 CC Mustang, original owner
Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 2:37pm
Using your thinking “it’s 2018” leave the Mustang alone and buy a FI boat. If you insist of wanting a 68 fuel injected boat drop in a new motor and take advantage of a true computer controlled fuel injected engine instead as also fits pieced together system IMHO.
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
Jonny Quest View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: August-20-2013
Location: Utah--via Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2863
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jonny Quest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 2:10pm
Several informative threads here about that. Bottom line: Very difficult to find a marine-specific and USCG approved fuel injection system. Also, due to the wet exhaust systems, the Oxygen Sensor required for fuel injection is a difficult problem to solve. Most will tell you to spend the money on a new carb, distributor and intake manifold.

Just my 2 cents...

JQ
Current
2003 Ski Nautique 206 Limited

Previous
2001 Ski Nautique Open Bow
1994 Ski Nautique Open Bow

Aqua skiing, ergo sum
Back to Top
KenVan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: July-05-2018
Location: Wayne, NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KenVan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July-05-2018 at 1:53pm
I have a '68 CC Mustang with a 289, 4 bbl. I would like to convert to fuel injection. There are several kits out there that seem like they'd work well. Howel Engineering has told me that their system will work very well without the O2 sensor, and this would certainly simplify the installation. Have any of you converted your motors to EFI? How did it go? What issues did you encounter? What system did you use?

I'm sure that some of you might be sickened by the idea of scraping a carb and you might even feel compelled to leave a not-so-nice comment here. Please don't. I would appreciate only constructive ideas from people who have ventured down this path. Personally, I think 4 bbl carbs are among the coolest things to sit atop a motor...but this is 2018. Carbs are headed in the same direction as the dinosaurs and EFI is a wonderful thing.
.
'68 CC Mustang, original owner
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page    <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC