Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1.88:1 tranny for a 454???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

1.88:1 tranny for a 454???

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
buddysproject View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: October-23-2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote buddysproject Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 1.88:1 tranny for a 454???
    Posted: April-02-2008 at 4:04am
ok, well you guys have been great so far. I was reading for most of the night and i can't seem to figure out what ratio tranny I will need, if I decide to swap out my 351w with a 454. I have an opportunity to get a 454 with a 1.88:1 borg tranny from a friend that is repowering his boat with diesels. Will this transmission work on an '87 sn 2001?
"If it can't be done in, on, or behind a Nautique it isn't worth doing."

Gregg 1987 SN
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41040
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 7:43am
Gregg, Here's my opinion. I feel that you would be getting into a big area of unknowns because a prop change would be needed. I'm sure you have read many of the threads regarding props and the "experimenting" or testing that many go through. Some prop changes work on some boats and others don't. You can talk to to prop manufacturers and they can run the calculations but the bottom line is they will tell you to try a prop change but really don't know exactly what will happen. With the 1.88, you would need to increase the prop pitch and or the prop diameter to compensate for the lower RPM. Increasing prop diameter is tough because to get any room under the boat to swing it a taller strut would be needed and this would increase the shaft angle. This would drastically change the hulls performance and I feel for the worse. Increasing the pitch to a point needed I feel you would be getting into the higher pitches where the efficiency of a prop drops off dramaticly. Efficiency or lack of slip is calculated by testing a boat with GPS speed, the prop RPM and the pitch of the prop.

The 1.88 is made for large boats that swing large props. I don't feel it is a good idea.


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5693
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 11:22am
I tend to agree you won't be looking at good propellor availability. I am in the middle of switching from a 1.1 to a 1.23 transmission which is much simpler due to the fact that a later version of my boat used that tranny but even with that the front engine mounting blocks, rear transmission mounting blocks and mounts, Prop shaft, and prop must still all be changed. Additionally the 1:23 transmissions are pushing it in terms of shaft size with the 1:88 your gonna need a larger shaft, so you can throw in a stuffing box and a strut and bearing.

Normally you would see that boat with a 454 with a 1:1 borg warner, they do make a big block version, which is slightly longer than the one you have on your 351. My guess is that your 454 possibility is a standard (same as automotive) rotation, the 351 you have was originally reverse rotation from the factory, thats a whole other can of worms. Anyway you want a to put a 454 in there, either rotation completely possible with money and time... using a 1:88 transmission with it very expensive and you won't find a prop for it when your done... not recommended.
-Joe.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
eric lavine View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: August-13-2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 13413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eric lavine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 11:57am
ski boats rely on a fast prop speed to shoot them out of the hole, its like the tires on a drag car, they want these props to hook up, as these guy's said if your turning your engine at 1880 rpms (with a 1.88) you will only get a prop speed of 1000 rpms, good for props with mass to move more weight and push a boat up on plane. with a 1.88 you would be way past the torque curve and the boat would propbably top out in the 20's
"the things you own will start to own you"
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 12:39pm
Originally posted by eric lavine eric lavine wrote:

with a 1.88 you would be way past the torque curve and the boat would propbably top out in the 20's

While I agree that the 1.88 in a ski boat is unproven, I dont know if I would agree with that statement. True, its probably out of the ideal ratio range, which seems to be settling close to 1.25:1, and prop selection would be a huge hassle- but I think it would be an interesting experiment.

With the right prop, reduction drive ski boats have very similar top end speeds as their 1:1 counterparts, with improved holeshot to boot. One only need to look as far as the 1.23 PCM's and the Mastercraft Powerslot boats (both 1.26:1 and 1.5:1) to prove that. 1.88 isnt that far out of the proven envelope and Id like to see someone try it- though it surely wont be me.

Dont go-fast outboards have a huge gear reduction paired to props with 20"+ of pitch? Seems like with the right selection of components, a reduction drive doesnt have to be limited to tugboat-like performance.
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5693
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 12:57pm
I agree you can get it up to speed with the right prop, question is whether that prop exists and if it is worth the effort and expense. I would say that he would realistically need a prop in the neighborhood of 13.5 x 23-25. Thats not going to happen in a once inch shaft for sure.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
BuffaloBFN View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-24-2007
Location: Gainesville,GA
Status: Offline
Points: 6094
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BuffaloBFN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 1:05pm
FWIW-my 1:1 BW spins a 14x14...while it fits nicely, there is not any extra room.
1988 BFN-sold



"It's a Livin' Thing...What a Terrible Thing to Lose" ELO
Back to Top
8122pbrainard View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: September-14-2006
Location: Three Lakes Wi.
Status: Offline
Points: 41040
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8122pbrainard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 1:27pm
Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:


and the Mastercraft Powerslot boats (both 1.26:1 and 1.5:1) to prove that.


Tim, I'm curious as to the prop Dia. and pitch the powerslots run. Do you know?


54 Atom


77 Tique

64 X55 Dunphy

Keep it original, Pete
<
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21124
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 1:29pm
Originally posted by 8122pbrainard 8122pbrainard wrote:

Originally posted by TRBenj TRBenj wrote:


and the Mastercraft Powerslot boats (both 1.26:1 and 1.5:1) to prove that.


Tim, I'm curious as to the prop Dia. and pitch the powerslots run. Do you know?

I think the 1.5:1 'slots (which is the conventional ratio dating back to the late 70's or early 80's) swung 14x18 wheels.
Back to Top
JoeinNY View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: October-19-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5693
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JoeinNY Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 1:36pm
Yep acme and oj carry the LH 1 1/8" props 13.7 x 17 up to 13.7x19.5 or so for non splined powerslot applications.
1983 Ski Nautique 2001
1967 Mustang 302 "Decoy"
Holeshot Video
Back to Top
Hollywood View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: February-04-2004
Location: Twin Lakes, WI
Status: Online
Points: 13512
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hollywood Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 2:54pm
You could buy one of those Ambush props Eric has the hook up on.
Back to Top
Luchog View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: April-17-2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 2135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luchog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-02-2008 at 11:19pm
I feel that getting more than 1.5:1 in a ski boat it's just too much.

A well propped 1.23:1 is noticeable better out of the hole than a 1:1 and places the engine better in the torque curve.

I remember my friend's '95 SN with the Gt40 Pro Boss, Power Plus tranny and OJ 4 blade prop as one of the best/strongest boats I have ever driven.
Back to Top
pmt2234 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: June-14-2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 46
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pmt2234 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April-03-2008 at 12:29am
It's a 454! Thats 103 more than a 351! How bad could it be?

Call some propeller vendors and make sure they can set you up with something and then try it.



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC