Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prop vs Performance
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Prop vs Performance

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
Jim_In_Houston View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: September-06-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1120
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jim_In_Houston Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Prop vs Performance
    Posted: January-09-2005 at 8:18pm
I am running a 12" x 13 pitch prop on my '68 Mustang. My stock 2V 289 (Interceptor) peaks at 4000 RPM. Is anyone running anything different on a simular vintage boat? If so, how is you performance?
Happy owner of a '66 and a '68 Mustang
Back to Top
64 Skier View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: February-08-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 415
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 64 Skier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-10-2005 at 6:52am
Jim,

My 289 in an old Mustang hull has the 12 x 14 and runs past 4400 RPM. Interceptor, rebuilt to 030 over, Performer Intake, Carter 4 BBL with 12 deg wedge plate, bigger valves in the head, 165 psi Compression. Still breaking her in so 4400 is Max for now, but it's no where near the limits.

I'm changing prop's to the one Keith recommended. I want low end torque, and quite frankly, the 4 BBL and HP Intake reduces the engines low end torque so I may have bought stuff I don;t need. I think your 2 BBL set up has the low end covered, but depending on your cam and valve size going to a 4BBL may not help you past 3500 RPM....if that's your question?

Exhaust hoses are tricky as well as the old manifolds and could be restricting your high end performance and or a restriction in the hose cold do the same.

The 289 should push the 12 x 13 higher IMO. How much compression is left in your '68 Stock engine?

Hope this helps.
64 Skier
66" HO VTX and 67" HO Triumph
71CC
Back to Top
Tim D View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah


Joined: August-23-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2635
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-10-2005 at 5:28pm
My '66 Mustang has a 12x12 prop. I have a spare 12x14, but I've never put it on. I really don't care about top end. I have never hit 4000 rpms. Reid P. can tell you to get top end performance.
Tim D
Back to Top
reidp View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: December-06-2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 1804
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote reidp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-11-2005 at 12:01pm
Jim,
Your engine being a 2V is most likely the 165 HP version of the 289, although I believe they made a 190 HP 2V version during several years. 4000 rpm may be a little on the low side but not by much for that engine. If anyone else has a manual on that engine they can check it or I'll check mine this evening for the recommended max rpm. I would expect the boat to run 38-43 mph. The 4V Mustangs of that hull design normally ran 44-48 mph from what I've seen.

Also, the last couple of older boats I've been on that had original tachs were observed to be significantly off, so I'd verify that to make sure unless you have a newer one. And if you've got a boat that's been thru multiple hands and has a prop stamp dated somewhere back long ago, there's a good chance that it may not be exactly what it's shown to be. We wasted a lot of time once working on a perfectly good engine trying to find out why it was way down on power and it was the prop holding it back the whole time.     
ReidP
1973 Mustang

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC