Holley Carb. Power Valve question |
Post Reply |
Author | |
uncle-buck
Senior Member Joined: June-14-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: July-02-2012 at 9:06pm |
It's getting time to rebuild the Holley carb on my 1990 Ski Nautique. When it was done 5 years ago, I recall installing a 6.5 Hg power valve, but can't remember the pros and cons of using it vs. the 2.5 Hg power valve that comes with the rebuild kit.
Will someone please opine on the differences? Thanks! |
|
1990 Ski Nautique (original owner)
PCM 351W with D.U.I. |
|
Bri892001
Grand Poobah Joined: September-27-2008 Location: Boston MA Status: Offline Points: 4945 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The 6.5 will basically run richer. Although, it's not quite that simple. I remember a few threads where everyone was really in favor of the 6.5, not sure exactly why.
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21125 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Kinda sorta. All the Holley PV's flow the same amount of fuel. The difference between them is how much vacuum is required to pull them open. The higher the number, the less vacuum is required- thus, it opens easier/sooner. The thought is that (to an extent), the higher the # PV, the more responsive the engine will be. The trade off for that responsiveness is a bit of fuel economy. Gottaski can explain this better than I can. |
|
Bri892001
Grand Poobah Joined: September-27-2008 Location: Boston MA Status: Offline Points: 4945 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tim, did you change yours? If so, did you see a difference?
|
|
TRBenj
Grand Poobah Joined: June-29-2005 Location: NWCT Status: Offline Points: 21125 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Im running a 7.5 in the '90. I couldnt tell you if it made a change- I did a bunch of things all at the same time. I can tell you for sure that the boat is plenty responsive!
|
|
Jllogan
Platinum Member Joined: May-18-2011 Location: canton, OH Status: Offline Points: 1728 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I switched over to the 6.5 from the 2.5 with the last rebuild. I think on a boat its really hard to feel subtle differences. Not like a car on a track where you can crossreference speed/distance markers.
|
|
GottaSki
Grand Poobah Joined: April-21-2005 Location: NE CT Status: Offline Points: 3333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I've rebuilt a few over the years , and found the 2.5 lacking.
With the 2.5, the carb wont come out of lean cruise till vacuum is 2.5 inches or less. However load is maxed when you come out of the hole, the engine needs the fuel then, else there is a subtle , yet reproducable dull spot 2-2500 rpm or so. The extra fuel from the pvcos is critical under high load, nobody changed the mains, nor lightened our boats, but suddenly carbs and kits are shipped with the 'leanest' pv that exists! I think it some half baked idea to use mrarginally less fuel. After 25 years, it was time for a fresh carb for myself, bolted on, set idle mix, tried to tune out that dull spot again, then just opened it up and threw a 6.5 in and its as smooth as an fi engine. |
|
"There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worthwhile as messing around with boats...simply messing."
River Rat to Mole |
|
uncle-buck
Senior Member Joined: June-14-2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks, guys!
|
|
1990 Ski Nautique (original owner)
PCM 351W with D.U.I. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |