Forums
NautiqueParts.comNautiqueSkins.com - Correct Craft Upholstery and Part
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - First Nautique  Acme 540 or 542
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

First Nautique Acme 540 or 542

 Post Reply Post Reply   
Author
joshjanae View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October-11-2015
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 87
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joshjanae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: First Nautique Acme 540 or 542
    Posted: January-14-2017 at 1:24am
I bought my first inboard a few months ago. It is a 1983 sn2001. I am very pleased with the purchase and feel like I got a great deal. Stringers are solid, boat starts and runs great. I had it out two days ago and happened upon a submerged rock about 100 feet offshore.   My prop is mangled. Luckily, I was only idling along and only hit the prop, not the hull.

I found a never used acme 540 for $250, might be able to get it for a little less. I plan on wakeboarding, skiing, surfing and barefooting. Am I going to kick myself for getting the 540 and not the 542? The 542 would be $120 more.

Should I stop worrying about it and buy the 540 with the plan to get the 542 later as a spare?

Thanks in advance.
Back to Top
Hollywood View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: February-04-2004
Location: Twin Lakes, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 13510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hollywood Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-14-2017 at 2:02am
Get the 540
Back to Top
OldSchoolBlue84 View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: December-02-2012
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Status: Offline
Points: 814
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OldSchoolBlue84 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-14-2017 at 2:09am
Originally posted by Hollywood Hollywood wrote:

Get the 540


Agree, changed my boats performance. My wife slalom's and I wakeboard and very pleased with the 540.
Back to Top
ultrahots View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: September-08-2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 618
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ultrahots Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-14-2017 at 3:12am
I have a 540 on my 83 and love it.
Back to Top
joshjanae View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October-11-2015
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 87
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joshjanae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 12:02am
Thanks everybody, Just bought the 540 for $225. I'm pretty excited. What is the difference between the commander manifolds and the triangle high rise ones? This is what's in my 83:

Back to Top
Gary S View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: November-30-2006
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 14096
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gary S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 12:29am
Clean looking setup. The Commander manifolds were made by Commander for their engine conversions,they came in aluminum and stainless. I have heard,don't know if it's true, that the aluminum ones caused all sort of problems for Commander so they switched to stainless. Biggest problem with them is that they are long. Like all log exhausts some cylinders exhaust has to travel farther to exit. The triangle ones are by Pleasurecraft Marine-PCM. They take up less room but also are more equal length. I think PCM eventually bought the Commander company.
69 Mustang HM SS
95 Nautique Super Sport
Back to Top
jbear View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-21-2005
Location: Lake Wales FL.
Status: Offline
Points: 8193
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jbear Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 1:41am
Commanders look way cooler.......


john
"Loud pipes save lives"



AdamT sez "I'm Canadian and a beaver lover myself"...
Back to Top
Riley View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: January-19-2004
Location: Portland, ME
Status: Offline
Points: 7946
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Riley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 10:37am
Originally posted by Hollywood Hollywood wrote:

Get the 540


540 is a 13x12? 542 is 13x11..5 and will spin too fast on a 2001?
Back to Top
Duane in Indy View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: October-26-2015
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 1578
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Duane in Indy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 10:45am
Originally posted by Riley Riley wrote:

540 is a 13x12? 542 is 13x11..5 and will spin too fast on a 2001?


Correct, 540 is 13 X 12
Keep it as original as YOU want it
        1978 Mustang (modified)
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21107
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 11:48am
Originally posted by Riley Riley wrote:

Originally posted by Hollywood Hollywood wrote:

Get the 540


540 is a 13x12? 542 is 13x11..5 and will spin too fast on a 2001?

Correct on the measurements but not the "spinning too fast" comment. Depends on the year of the boat and how it's used. 542 is more appropriate for some 2001's (even for general use).

In the case above, I agree 540 sounds like the way to go based on the boat and described usage.
Back to Top
Morfoot View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: February-06-2004
Location: South Lanier
Status: Offline
Points: 5311
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Morfoot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 1:11pm
I bought a 542 as a spare for my 88'. I have not as yet put it on to see what the numbers are as compared to the 540 numbers I did a few years ago when I first got it. May have to run numbers again on both the 540 & 542 on the same day possibly this weekend if the nice weather holds out.
"Morfoot; He can ski. He can wakeboard.He can cook chicken.He can create his own self-named beverage, & can also apparently fly. A man of many talents."72 Mustang "Kermit",88 SN Miss Scarlett, 99 SN "Sherman"
Back to Top
TRBenj View Drop Down
Grand Poobah
Grand Poobah
Avatar

Joined: June-29-2005
Location: NWCT
Status: Offline
Points: 21107
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TRBenj Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-16-2017 at 1:38pm
Definitely run them the same day under the same loading conditions if you want to make any sort of comparison, Tim. My bet is that the later 2001 (87-88) may benefit from the 542, where the early boats probably favor the 540.
Back to Top
joshjanae View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October-11-2015
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 87
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote joshjanae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January-18-2017 at 1:19am
Thanks for all the comments. This boat is like a dream. I have been searching for a decent priced nautique for a while and I was more than happy to trade my I/O runabout for the 2001.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Copyright 2024 | Bagley Productions, LLC