You didn build that !

john b wrote: Do you have any idea how far from logic your argument is? Do you know David's car was damaged? We think it wasnt, and if it was, he did it himself. What experience and knowledge would cause you to think death threats are easily solved? You are blinded by a fanaticism I normally only seen in cults. Our sign ordnance is strict, but they substituted a $75 fine for the death sentence some years ago.

John. First who is David? I believe Andy had his car vandalized, and I do not think he did it himself. I don't think death threats are easily solved. I think letters sent by frustrated idiots that are unable to effectively articulate their point of view tend to be easy to trace. these are the rocket scientists that will write the letter on the back of a "recycled" correspondence addressed to them, or use the traceable office postage meter to save a stamp.

As far as the left pinning stuff on the right this is the case I was thinking of from 2008.

Vandalism suspect had worked for candidate
BY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS


Email Print
DENVER — A suspect in a vandalism at the Colorado Democratic headquarters was once a paid campaign worker for a Democratic candidate for the Legislature, according to public records.

Maurice Schwenkler, 24, was arrested in Denver Tuesday on a charge of criminal mischief after windows were smashed at Democratic offices. Many of the windows displayed posters supporting health care reform, and party officials called it political vandalism.

The Denver Post reported Wednesday that Schwenkler was also arrested in St. Paul, Minn., on the last day of the 2008 Republican convention on a charge of unlawful assembly.

No details of that arrest or Schwenkler's activities at the time were immediately available.

There was no phone number listed for Schwenkler and it wasn't immediately clear if he had an attorney.

The Post reported Schwenkler was paid $500 in November 2008 to walk door to door in support of Democrat Mollie Cullom, a candidate for the state House from Centennial.

Cullom lost to Republican David Balmer.

Campaign records show Schwenkler was among dozens of canvassers paid by a political committee called the Colorado Citizens' Coalition.

Balmer said he suspects the vandalism might have been intended to make the Republican Party look bad.

“This sounds like the type of Democratic tactic from the left fringe trying to make Republicans look mean-spirited,” Balmer said. “In this case, it blew up in their face.”

The Democratic Party estimates the damage at $10,000. A second suspect was still at large.

Denver Police said they don't know what motivated the suspects. The headquarters was unoccupied at the time and there were no injuries reported.

———

Information from: The Denver Post, http://www.denverpost.com


Following up on it today I learned this. Proof that the left is stranger than fiction.


Transgender anarchist Ariel Attack pleaded guilty today to smashing eleven storefront-style windows at the Colorado Democratic Party headquarters in August. She pleaded to a second-degree misdemeanor, will be placed on one year probation and pay $5,000. In the wake of the politically charged
dramatic act of vandalism, Attack faced felony charges of criminal mischief. Attack smashed the windows with an accomplice at 2:30 in the morning August 25 and was apprehended on her bicycle after a brief chase. The accomplice was never caught and remains unnamed in public records.

The morning after the incident, Colorado Democratic Party Chairwoman Pat Waak estimated damage at $10,000. She also originally blamed conservative opponents to Democratic-sponsored health care reform for the vandalism, pointing out that windows were smashed in front of health care posters. She walked back that speculation when Attack’s birth name, Maurice Schwenkler, appeared on a campaign finance document showing she’d been paid last November by a Democratic-leaning get-out-the-vote organization.
Conservatives decried the accusations as inflammatory and demanded Waak apologize.


This brings me back to my blurred right and wrong theory.

Another case of the right being wrongfully blamed, at least initially.

Deer destroys Obama sign.

Of course the deer could be anti Obama. Probably heard about Obama wasting all those bucks and wanting to re-distribute dough (sounds like doe, deer don't understand homonyms). hee hee.

Riley wrote: If we're going to change the rules so 2 guys can get married, while not let 10 guys marry each other?

Maybe for the same reason 3 women and 7 men can't get married.

Riley wrote: If we're going to change the rules so 2 guys can get married, while not let 10 guys marry each other?

Maybe for these reason 3 women and 7 men can't get married.

GlassSeeker wrote: did I say it was a problem????

Can you say facetious? The consenting adult and as long as it doesnt hurt anyone remarks go back some pages to a gay/lesbian acceptance discussion.

harddock wrote: Early voting in Texas has begun

Loved the movie 2016. True facts.

did I say it was a problem????

Watch the movie 2016

GlassSeeker wrote: Romney will legalize polygamy if elected.

Based on what?????????

GlassSeeker wrote: Romney will legalize polygamy if elected.

Funny you would think that considering Obama's father took a second wife without divorcing the first.

I think it is so funny how Obama is grasping for anything and only has personal childish attacks left. Romney chooses not to stoop down too his level. Which is making him look even worse.

OverMyHead wrote: john b wrote: Yea, this is what those high ideals Republicans did to my neighbors last election. Determining the cause of vandalism is always questionable, however death threats are not. Death Threats There are reports of it happening again, however it was not published so as not to scare the family's children. John, did Chicago's finest ever solve this one? Sounds like one that usually gets figured out, especially if the city council return address was legit. I only ask because I remember a lot of "self inflicted" incidents last time around, with people trying to generate a bias for the other side. Basically trying to create the racism they were looking for from the right but could not find evidence of. If the city council really sent it out that is the strictest yard sign policy I have ever heard of.

OverMyHead wrote: john b wrote: Yea, this is what those high ideals Republicans did to my neighbors last election. Determining the cause of vandalism is always questionable, however death threats are not. Death Threats There are reports of it happening again, however it was not published so as not to scare the family's children. John, did Chicago's finest ever solve this one? Sounds like one that usually gets figured out, especially if the city council return address was legit. I only ask because I remember a lot of "self inflicted" incidents last time around, with people trying to generate a bias for the other side. Basically trying to create the racism they were looking for from the right but could not find evidence of. If the city council really sent it out that is the strictest yard sign policy I have ever heard of.

Do you have any idea how far from logic your argument is? Do you know David's car was damaged? We think it wasnt, and if it was, he did it himself. What experience and knowledge would cause you to think death threats are easily solved?
You are blinded by a fanaticism I normally only seen in cults.
Our sign ordnance is strict, but they substituted a $75 fine for the death sentence some years ago.

john b wrote: Yea, this is what those high ideals Republicans did to my neighbors last election. Determining the cause of vandalism is always questionable, however death threats are not. Death Threats There are reports of it happening again, however it was not published so as not to scare the family's children.

John, did Chicago's finest ever solve this one? Sounds like one that usually gets figured out, especially if the city council return address was legit. I only ask because I remember a lot of "self inflicted" incidents last time around, with people trying to generate a bias for the other side. Basically trying to create the racism they were looking for from the right but could not find evidence of.

If the city council really sent it out that is the strictest yard sign policy I have ever heard of.

Normally, I really don't like to engage in talk about politics or religion, but, I did see a great sign in Milwaukee yesterday.

Milwaukee is a very liberal town, as is a lot of Wisconsin, but, I have to tell you, in my travels through southeast part of the state yesterday, for every one Obama sign I saw, I saw nine Romney signs. Its called Mittmentum

I thought this sign said it all. The bottom point said "We the people....are going to have to let Obama go".

Hmmmm....funny that Lybia is so important. Bush was warned about 911 and he lost thousands that day. Oh yeah...he was reading to preschoolers or rather they were teaching him how to. That's right, I remember now. Is that the best you guys can do? You've got nothing.

SN206 wrote: skicat2001 wrote: I early voted today. Took me 5 seconds. Romney 1 Obama 0 Romney 2 Obama 0